AmberWillo

Your mind goes blank in reviews. Highwire’s AI feedback data may miss this gap

Highwire says 78% of managers say they've used an AI tool to handle employee feedback or a performance review in the past 12 months. For nervous speakers, the missing piece is more specific.

By Maria Lee·

A Black woman freezes during a performance review while a manager waits with a pen above an open notebook

You know the office version of the blank. Your manager asks how a meeting went, or a review turns toward a presentation you gave, and suddenly the clean explanation you had in your head disappears. Now that feedback itself is changing, that moment may get even stranger. Highwire, in research released via GlobeNewswire, says 78% of managers say they've used an AI tool to handle employee feedback or a performance review in the past 12 months.

That sounds like more feedback, faster. But if your problem is that your mind goes blank when people look at you, more comments after the fact may still leave one gap untouched. It is not the gap many people expect. We will get to the missing piece at the end. First, what Highwire's survey says is changing inside the review itself.

How AI is entering workplace feedback

Highwire via GlobeNewswire, based on a survey conducted in August 2026 among 1,034 U.S. full-time corporate professionals at organizations with 100 or more employees.

The review may be faster, but less clear

The most uncomfortable part of Highwire's finding is not only that AI is being used. It is that many workers do not know when it is being used. Highwire reported that just 16% of individual contributors say they were told AI played a role in their most recent review, and 40% either suspect it was used without confirmation or aren't sure at all.

For a confident speaker, that may feel like a process issue. For someone who blanks under attention, it can feel personal. A review is already a watched moment. You are trying to sound calm, accurate and fair about your own performance while someone else is evaluating you. If you also wonder whether part of the judgment came from a tool you did not see, the pressure does not get simpler.

People are practicing the hard conversation somewhere else

Highwire also found that 25% of professionals have already used AI to rehearse a difficult workplace conversation. That detail matters because rehearsal is not the same as review. A review looks backward. Rehearsal gives you a place to say the words before the real person is watching.

A professional sits alone at a conference room table after a review, staring at a laptop while a notebook and pen sit nearby
A review can tell you how something landed. It may not tell you what to practice before the next watched moment.

That distinction is easy to miss. If you freeze in a meeting, a review might say you seemed unprepared, hesitant or not concise. Those comments may be true. They may even be useful. But they do not automatically turn into the next thing to do before the next meeting, interview or difficult conversation.

That is the loop hiding inside the AI feedback story. Workplace feedback may be getting automated, summarized and delivered faster. But for the person whose mind goes blank, speed is not the only issue. The question is whether the feedback names the next behavior clearly enough to practice out loud.

Why generic feedback misses the watched moment

A blank does not usually happen while you are calmly reading your notes alone. It happens when attention turns toward you. In a performance review, that might be when you are asked to explain why a presentation went off track. In a team meeting, it might be when a senior person asks a follow-up. In an interview, it might be the first unexpected question.

So the useful unit of improvement is small. Not "be more confident." Not "communicate better." The useful unit is one observable thing you can do the next time the room goes quiet and waits. That is where our own cut of nervous-speaker data points to the gap many reviews do not close.

The missing piece was smaller than feedback itself

Among the 708 AmberWillo respondents whose biggest challenge was that their mind goes blank or they forget what to say, 124 people selected having no one to give feedback as the thing stopping them from practicing. A much larger group, 389 people, selected not knowing what to work on.

What stops practice among people whose minds go blank

Counts are from 708 AmberWillo onboarding answers from people who picked mind going blank or forgetting what to say as their biggest speaking challenge.

That does not mean feedback is unimportant. It means feedback that stops at judgment can leave the speaker in the same place. The person may know the review was not great. They may know they sounded uncertain. What they still may not have is one specific behavior to rehearse before the next watched moment.

What this means for you

If your mind blanks in a review, meeting or presentation, do not treat every comment as equally useful. After any feedback, ask one practical question: What should I practice out loud before this happens again?

Turn the answer into a tiny drill. Practice the first sentence of your update. Practice a recovery line such as "Let me take that in parts." Practice summarizing one point in 30 seconds while a camera is on. The goal is not to collect more judgment. The goal is to convert feedback into one action you can repeat before the next person looks at you.

Sources

More from AmberWillo News